Disclaimer: I’m not anti-Peat. I’ve known about Peat for 10+ years and used to be on RP forum before moderators did a 180.
Just looking for peoples thoughts on this.
So, without going too deep into this, I have multiple diagnosed health disorders since childhood (urticaria, asthma, insomnia, IBS, headaches, ADHD, etc.) and it’s genetic as my mother’s side of the family all have similar health disorders— including the ones from different continents, eating different diets, speaking different languages, etc.
it’s clearly genetic.
However, I have found that my ADHD, insomnia, general cognition, ability to concentrate/not procrastinate/work long hours without fatigue, and how well I feel are all significantly improved by a large dosage of both NAC and Tryptophan supplementation each day, with a high methionine diet (lots of beef) making me feel far better, as well.
Under Peat’s viewpoint, this is disastrous. The exact opposite of everything he stands for.
All ADHD stimulants, the greatest legal dopaminergic sources that currently exist, don’t help me in any of the above regards the same way NAC and Tryptophan do.
The “peaty” or “dopaminergic” or “anti-stress” things (all supposedly correlate) like: Coffee, gelatin, TTFD (B1 that goes to brain), Niacinamide, Vitamin D3, Tryptophan depletion and/or low intake, avoidance of starch and/or excess fiber… all make me worse. I cannot concentrate at all, worse cognition/memory, more angry, less happy, worse sleep, more headaches, muscle pains get worse, etc.
One would think glycine or taurine would help, but that’s too sedating. NAC, though, has a stabilizing effect on Glutamate, specifically. Tryptophan increasing Serotonin also modulates glutamate.
I think maybe some people genetically are already very dopaminergic in their brain and/or low serotonin or high glutamate? And Peat’s principles would not really address such people in the best way.
Does anyone else have anecdotes, thoughts, opinions, or just general ideas on this?