r/santarosa • u/Silly_Rub_6304 • 1h ago
Santa Rosa flock public records analysis β the police are still lying to us
I went through Santa Rosa's Flock audit logs (Jan 2025 to Oct 2026) and compared them to what the chief said at the Sept 17 community meeting (YouTube transcript of the meeting).
There are two kinds of files. The "Audit" files list every search SRPD ran, 113,303 of them. The "Network Audit" files list every search, by any agency, that included Santa Rosa's cameras, and those add up to 9,166,792 searches by 369 outside agencies. (I checked that reading against the data itself: every SRPD search in the network files also shows up in SRPD's own audit, and the only SRPD searches missing from the network files are the 3,699 that left Santa Rosa's cameras out.)
Then I lined the numbers up against the transcript of the September 17 meeting at the Utilities Field Office.
Outside access to Santa Rosa's cameras stopped around 12:30 PM on September 1, 2026. Since September 10 the only outside agency searching them has been the Sonoma County Sheriff. Case numbers also became effectively mandatory in mid-January 2026. Those are real changes. They are also recent, and the 20 months before them look very different from the picture painted at the meeting.
| Chief's claim (transcript time) | What the logs show | Question for the city |
|---|---|---|
| "We're now limiting sharing just to Northern California" (18:18) | Before Sept 1, 2026, Southern California agencies ran 4,179,611 searches of Santa Rosa cameras, 45.6% of all outside searches since Jan 2025. Riverside County Sheriff alone ran 745,996 and LAPD ran 330,416. | What changed on Sept 1, 2026, who made the decision, and why wasn't it done sooner? |
| "At one time, we did share with NCRIC and WSIN" (1:05:20) | NCRIC (the Northern California fusion center) ran 233,116 searches from Jan 1, 2025 to Aug 20, 2026, about 10,000 to 18,000 a month through May 2026. No WSIN account appears in the logs. | When was NCRIC first given access, and on what date was it removed? |
| "Doesn't share with agencies outside California or certainly with any federal agency" (57:20) | "[Federal] Loma Linda Healthcare System CA Veterans Affairs PD" searched Santa Rosa cameras on May 27 and May 29, 2025. The state AG says SB 34 doesn't permit sharing with federal agencies. | How did a federal VA police department get access, and was the AG notified? |
| (same claim) | In 2025 alone, 95 California agencies ran 5,871 searches of Santa Rosa cameras with reasons naming federal agencies: US Marshals 1,421, Postal Inspection 1,059, FBI/JTTF 820, Homeland Security Investigations 739, DEA 732, ATF 468. Flock switched to dropdown-only reasons around January 2026, so later cases can't be spotted this way. | Were outside agencies running searches on behalf of HSI and other federal agencies, and does SRPD consider that sharing? |
| "The furthest that you can search back is 30 days" (48:13) | 3,398 SRPD searches reached back more than 30 days. 80 reached back more than a year, and the longest reached back 1,826 days (March 5, 2026). | If the system limits searches to 30 days, why did it accept these? |
| (same claim) | On Sept 17, 2026, the day of the meeting, SRPD searched its own cameras for April 2026 and May 2026 time windows, and for a window starting Sept 1, 2022. Reason given: "City Planning/Traffic Analysis." | If data is deleted after 30 days, what did those searches return? |
| "Every single ALPR search ... requires ... the case number or the incident number" (45:20) | The Case # field was blank for 59,633 of 68,467 SRPD searches (87%) between Jan 1, 2025 and Jan 13, 2026. Since Jan 14, 2026 it's blank for 36 of 35,624. Many 2025 reasons look like redacted case numbers, but 7,164 searches had no case number in either field and 2,230 had no reason at all. | When exactly did case numbers become mandatory, and how were the 2025 searches audited without them? |
| State law allows sharing with "a local law enforcement agency, meaning a police agency or sheriff's department" (18:26) | Searchers also included DA offices, CDCR, Cal Fire, Fish & Wildlife, the Department of Insurance, college and school-district police, and two tribal police departments (29 searches). | Who approved each of these, and where is the signed agreement for each one? |
| (not mentioned) | 697 automated "Peregrine integration" lookups ran from March 2025 to January 2026, 33 of them with three-year windows. | What is Peregrine, what does it pull, and how long does it keep it? |
| (not mentioned) | 7,550 searches of Santa Rosa cameras by 195 outside agencies listed the reason as test, training, or demo. | Why are Santa Rosa residents' plates being used for other agencies' testing? |
| (not mentioned) | SRPD still searches far beyond Santa Rosa. Since Sept 2, 2026, 3,737 of its 4,644 searches covered 500 or more networks, while only one outside agency can search ours. | Which agencies' cameras is SRPD searching now? |
Claude loaded every monthly file, removed about 7,000 exact duplicate rows, and re-ran the headline numbers from the raw spreadsheets with separate code (they matched). "Southern California" here means agencies in Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, Ventura and Imperial counties only, which keeps the count conservative. None of the reasons mention ICE by name or immigration enforcement. HSI also handles drug and trafficking cases, so the federal-reason row shows outside agencies using our cameras for federal work, which is a separate question from immigration enforcement. And the logs record what was searched and nothing about what came back, so the long-lookback rows raise questions without proving that older data still exists.
The AG's guidance on SB 34 is here: https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/media/2023-dle-06.pdf
At 9:05 on the morning of the meeting, someone at SRPD searched our cameras for April.